Telecommunications Entrepreneur Concocts Grand Scam: Off-Shore Accounts, Smart Business Planning or Underhanded Tax Evasion?

by Naureen Amjad April 6 2007, 15:15

Introduction:

There is no way to get around paying taxes. This was a fact Walter Anderson learned the hard way. While directors may owe fiduciary duties to their shareholders in terms of wealth maximization, this cannot be accomplished through illegal means. Shareholders expect their directors and officers to legitimately run the business and to employ their acquired business knowledge in order to promote shareholder wealth. Anderson interpreted such Delaware law to allow him full access to evade payment of personal income taxes by storing his acquired assets in off-shore bank accounts, away from the reach of the Internal Revenue Service.[1] Such actions were not considered sound business judgment and Anderson has been indicted for engaging in a tax evasion scheme, obstructing the IRS, and defrauding the District of Columbia government by failing to pay over $200 million in taxes.[2]

“Most people obey the tax laws: they report their income to the IRS and pay the taxes due ... honest taxpayers deserve the assurance that those who willfully dodge their tax obligations will be investigated, prosecuted, and punished," said Assistant Attorney General O'Connor.[3] This has definitely held true. Growing up, Anderson was surrounded by an affluent lifestyle and endless opportunities, but such stature did not preclude a thorough investigation into his illegal activities.[4] During his sentencing, Anderson’s friends and relatives went as far as describing him as a “caring man who made a mistake,” but that his mistake was not motivated by personal greed or luxury, detailing his donations to space exploration, helping budding entrepreneurs and establishing a philanthropic foundation.[5] While Anderson may have put his illegally acquired money to smart use, he was still unjustified in his attempt to defraud the IRS in obtaining such funds. The subsequent charitable use of the stolen funds could never be sufficient to wipe the slate clean for a tax-evader such as Anderson. If such were to be the case, any money launderer would remember to donate some small portion of his loot, so as to remain in good terms with the IRS.

Anderson’s scheme was not some small ploy to avoid paying a few dollars. Rather, it has been coined the “largest tax-scam ever.”[6] He had earned millions from telecommunications companies after the AT&T breakup and was subsequently known for his goal to reform the failing Mir space station.[7] His grand jury indictment was due to, over a five-year period, conducting billion dollar business through offshore corporations in Panama and the British Virgin Islands in order to make it seem like he himself was not personally earning the income.[8] Ultimately, Anderson’s vision included forming an offshore corporation named Gold & Appel Transfer and hired a trust company to serve as the registered agent and sole director.[9] Gold & Appel was previously owned by another company also formed by Anderson and he then granted himself an exclusive option to purchase Gold & Appel shares for a nominal sum, ensuring no one else could have access to the shares.[10] The unique way in which Anderson formed the companies was not by chance. Anderson purposely concocted his plan so as neither the option nor Anderson’s name was recorded in public records, yet he was able to maintain total control.[11] In addition, during the time of the tax evasion scheme, Anderson claimed to be living in Florida, which does not have a state income tax requirement, while he actually resided in two different residences in the District of Columbia. 

Anderson’s failings, while largely comprised of tax fraud, also involved breaches of fiduciary duties to shareholders. While Anderson was the sole shareholder for Gold & Appel, he was not the sole shareholder of his other companies and thus had a duty to run those business for the benefit of the shareholders. However, it was not his shareholder’s wealth maximization that he was concerned with, but his own. It would seem imperative that in order to run a business for the benefit of the owners, the director/CEO not jeopardize the company’s functioning by leaving it vulnerable to illegality. Anderson owed a duty of loyalty to his shareholders that he breached when he made business decisions in order to compile a hefty stack of money for his own benefit and did not take into account the shareholders’ potential loss when the company would be shut down.[12] In the end, it is clear that Anderson felt he could plan a magic scheme that would not be uncovered by the revenue regulators. Anderson may have viewed the benefit of saving millions through tax evasion as taking precedent over staying in compliance with the law, but now he is left to deal with a hefty $200 million fine and loss of reputation, in addition to a potential 80 year prison sentence.

[1] Telecommunications Entrepreneur Indicted and Arrested in $200 Million Tax Evasion Case, DOJ Release No. 078 (Feb. 28, 2005).

[2] Carol D. Leonning, Mogul Sentenced to 9 Years For Tax Evasion and Fraud, washingtonpost.com, Mar. 28, 2007, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2007/03/27/AR2007032702122.html?nav=rss_technology.

[3] Id.

[4] Id.

[5] Matt Apuzzo, Tax Cheat Escapes $100 Million Repayment, USAToday.com, Mar. 31, 2007, http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-03-28-2808877398_x.htm.

[6] Pete Williams, Entrepreneur Accused of Biggest-Ever Tax Scam, MSNBC.com (Mar. 31, 2007), http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7046153/.

[7] Bloomberg News, Entrepreneur Gets 9 Years in Tax Case, NYTimes.com, Mar. 28, 2007, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/28/business/28tax.html?ex=1332734400&en=66079ef6550ead84&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss.

[8] Id.

[9] Telecommunications Entrepreneur Indicted and Arrested in $200 Million Tax Evasion Case, supra note 1.

[10] Id.

[11] Id.

[12] Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 404 (2002).

Tags:

Corporate

Comments (10) -

12/2/2010 1:50:11 AM #

Hello just thought i would tell you something.. This is twice now i've landed on your blog in the last 3 weeks searching for completely unrelated things. Spooky or what?

Jocuri United States

12/2/2010 4:31:15 AM #

Hi just thought i would tell you something.. This is twice now i've landed on your blog in the last 2 days hunting for completely unrelated things. Spooky or what?

Jocuri online United States

12/3/2010 5:15:04 PM #

Hi, i must say fantastic site you have, i stumbled across it in AOL. Does you get much traffic?

Jocuri United States

12/3/2010 6:32:23 PM #

Hi, i must say fantastic website you have, i stumbled across it in AOL. Does you get much traffic?

Jocuri United States

12/3/2010 6:33:07 PM #

Hi just thought i would tell you something.. This is twice now i've landed on your blog in the last 3 weeks searching for totally unrelated things. Spooky or what?

Jocuri United States

12/4/2010 4:31:11 AM #

Hi, i must say fantastic website you have, i stumbled across it in AOL. Does you get much traffic?

Jocuri United States

12/14/2010 8:44:32 AM #

How are you ? This is Sanjay Das <kreditme@yahoo.com>

Sanjay Das United States

12/19/2010 5:55:52 PM #

The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod's. It works well, but isn't as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that's not an issue, but if you're planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod's larger screen and better browser may be important.

trance United States

12/21/2010 6:22:31 AM #

thanks for this nice post

chackerz Philippines

12/29/2010 10:20:35 AM #

Mucho Thanks!

Emergency Vehicle Lights United States

Add comment

  Country flag

biuquote
Loading

Theme by Mads Kristensen

Invitation


We invite law professors, practitioners, and students to submit short articles for publication on this website. Simply email articles to the editors of the journal using the "Contact" form link above.   We also strongly encourage readers to post comments relating to a specific article or a topic covered by an article on the website. Just click on the "Comments" link located in the post footer below each article.

Recent Comments

  • So Sue Me! (9)
    Apartments in Monroe MI wrote: Some things people will do for money are just beyo... [More]
  • So Sue Me! (9)
    Cheng wrote: Very interesting story. You need guts to say that ... [More]
Comment RSS

Disclaimer

This Journal is published by members of the Business Law Society at the University of Illinois College of Law. It is not a publication of the University of Illinois, and, therefore, the University of Illinois bears no responsibility for its content. Moreover, this Internet publication is prepared as an informational service only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Although every attempt is made to ensure the information is accurate and timely, the information is presented "as is" and without warranties, either express or implied.